← Texas Business Law Glossary

Texas Business Law · Glossary

Intercreditor Agreement

A contract between two or more creditors of the same borrower governing their respective rights, priorities, and remedies vis-à-vis each other. Most common in capital structures with a senior secured lender and a junior or mezzanine lender. Addresses lien priority, payment subordination, enforcement standstills, voting rights in workouts, bankruptcy cooperation, and DIP financing rights.

An intercreditor agreement is a contract between two or more creditors of the same borrower governing their respective rights, priorities, and remedies vis-à-vis each other. Intercreditor agreements are most common in multi-tier capital structures, senior secured lender plus junior or mezzanine lender, or first-lien plus second-lien lenders. The agreement allocates rights regarding the borrower's collateral, the timing and order of payment, enforcement actions, voting in restructurings, and behavior in bankruptcy. Although the borrower is typically a party (or signs an acknowledgment), the agreement's principal economic effect is between the creditors.

Lien priority and lien subordination

The core function of most intercreditor agreements is establishing lien priority, which creditor's security interest in the collateral is senior. Two principal models: (1) first-lien/second-lien structure, both creditors have liens on the same collateral, with the second-lien creditor expressly subordinated; (2) senior/mezzanine structure, senior creditor has lien on operating company assets, mezzanine creditor has lien on holding company equity (not on operating-company assets). The agreement specifies that the subordinated lien is junior in all respects, payment, enforcement, distribution of proceeds.

Payment subordination

Payment subordination provisions govern when junior creditor may receive payments. Two principal models: (1) deep payment subordination, junior receives no payments until senior is paid in full; (2) limited payment subordination, junior receives ordinary scheduled payments while no senior default exists, but junior payments are blocked during specified default conditions. Modern intercreditor agreements typically use limited payment subordination with payment blocks triggered by senior payment defaults or financial-covenant defaults.

Enforcement standstills

Enforcement standstills prohibit the junior creditor from taking enforcement action (foreclosure, lawsuit, exercise of remedies) against the borrower or collateral for a specified period after the senior creditor has been notified of a default. Standstill periods range from 90 to 180 days; some agreements use cumulative standstill caps. The senior lender uses the standstill period to formulate its enforcement strategy without competing junior-creditor actions undermining its position. Standstill expiration restores the junior's enforcement rights but typically still subject to senior priority.

Bankruptcy provisions

Intercreditor agreements address several bankruptcy issues: (1) cash collateral and DIP financing, junior creditor's agreement to support or not oppose senior's cash collateral and DIP financing positions; (2) plan voting, junior creditor's voting on plans of reorganization may be governed by intercreditor terms; (3) section 1111(b) elections, coordinating the parties' bankruptcy elections; (4) relief from stay, agreements about which creditor will pursue stay relief; (5) turnover, junior agrees to turn over to senior any payments received in violation of subordination. Section 510(a) of the Bankruptcy Code makes subordination agreements enforceable in bankruptcy.

Buy-out rights and amendments

Many intercreditor agreements grant the junior creditor a "buy-out right", the right to purchase the senior debt at par after a stated default period, putting the junior in the senior position. This can be an attractive option when the junior wants to control the workout. Senior creditors often include "no-amendment" provisions limiting junior's right to amend its own loan documents in ways adverse to senior (extending maturity, increasing principal, increasing payment terms beyond defined parameters).

Practical context

For Texas borrowers stacking multiple debt tranches, intercreditor agreements between the senior and junior lenders are typically negotiated between the lenders without significant borrower input, but the borrower's downstream operating flexibility is materially affected. Borrowers should understand: (1) which creditor controls workout discussions; (2) what default events block junior payments and could shift control; (3) whether mezzanine debt can be amended without senior consent; (4) how the structure interacts with potential equity financings or M&A. For lenders, intercreditor terms often determine the practical recovery curve in distress; the negotiation should reflect realistic stress scenarios rather than just the optimistic base case.

Related Terms
Promissory Note· Security Interest· Perfection· Default· Covenant (Financial)
Referenced by
Mezzanine Financing· Priority· Subordination Agreement· Workout and Restructuring
Last updated: August 14, 2026